Compare ETS
Use this function to compare the design elements and characteristics of up to three ETSs from around the world.
Canada - Québec Cap-and-Trade System
General Information
Québec’s Cap-and-Trade (C&T) System started in 2013 and covers ~80% of the province’s GHG emissions.
The system covers fuel combustion emissions in the mining and extractives, power, buildings, transport, industrial, agriculture and forestry sectors, as well as industrial process emissions. Covered entities must surrender ‘emission allowances’ for all their covered emissions, and allocation is based on auctions or free allocation. The cap is determined top-down by the government and set in law years before compliance obligations are realized.*
Most emission units are auctioned, with a portion freely allocated to emissions-intensive, trade-exposed (EITE) sectors and to electricity producers with fixed-price sales contracts concluded before the announcement of the system. Québec also keeps an emission units reserve account to sell to entities that do not have enough allowances to cover their obligations. Covered entities can also cover a part of their GHG emissions by using offset credits.
Québec formally linked its system with California’s in 2014
*In Québec’s Cap-and-Trade System, the term ‘emissions allowance’ includes emission units (i.e., the main compliance instrument that other systems typically refer to as ‘allowances’), offset credits, early reduction credits and any other emission allowance determined by regulation, each being equal to one tonne of GHG expressed in CO2 equivalents.
In 2025, Québec’s C&T system continued operating smoothly while the government outlined its vision for green economy in the rest of the decade and advanced regulatory reforms. In June, Québec published its “2025 to 2030 Implementation Plan for a Green Economy”, with funding primarily from carbon market revenues. The revenues support initiatives including transportation electrification, energy efficiency programs, and clean technology development.
Québec’s regulatory amendments to the C&T system progressed through 2025, following stakeholder consultations in 2023 and a market notice in October 2024. The draft regulation is expected to be published in winter 2025 to 2026, with likely enactment in spring/summer 2026.
The 2021 to 2023 compliance period results, released in December 2024, showed a 99.3% compliance rate among covered emitters.* Over the first four compliance periods (2013 to 2023), offset credits represented approximately 6% of total units surrendered.
*The only non-compliant emitter had filed for bankruptcy under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act.
The system held four joint quarterly auctions with California in 2025, generating CAD 1.1 billion (USD 0.8 billion) in revenues for Québec.
Emissions & Targets
78.0 MtCO2e (2023)
By 2035: 37.5% reduction from 1990 GHG levels (“Order in Council 62-2026”)
By 2050: Carbon neutrality objective (“2030 Plan for a Green Economy”)
Updated prices available here
Size & Phases
FIRST COMPLIANCE PERIOD: Two years (2013 to 2014)
SECOND COMPLIANCE PERIOD: Three years (2015 to 2017)
THIRD COMPLIANCE PERIOD: Three years (2018 to 2020)
FOURTH COMPLIANCE PERIOD: Three years (2021 to 2023)
FIFTH COMPLIANCE PERIOD: Three years (2024 to 2026)
An absolute cap limits the total emissions allowed in the system and is fixed ex-ante.
FIRST COMPLIANCE PERIOD: The system started in 2013 with a cap of 23.2 MtCO2e.
SECOND COMPLIANCE PERIOD: With the program expanding to include fuel distribution, the cap rose to 65.3 MtCO2e in 2015. The cap declined to 61 MtCO2e in 2017, at an average rate of 3.2% per year.
THIRD COMPLIANCE PERIOD: The cap started at 59 MtCO2e and declined at an average annual rate of 3.5% to reach 54.7 MtCO2e in 2020.
FOURTH COMPLIANCE PERIOD AND BEYOND: After a slight nominal increase in the cap in 2021, to 55.3 MtCO2e, due to an adjustment of the global warming potential of different GHGs, the cap will be reduced annually by ~2.2% on average until 2030. This will result in a cap of 44.1 MtCO2e in 2030.
FIRST COMPLIANCE PERIOD: Producers and importers of electricity and industrial facilities.
SECOND COMPLIANCE PERIOD AND BEYOND: Sectors from the first compliance period as well as the distribution and importation of fuels used in the transport and building sectors and in small- and medium-sized businesses.
TYPES OF FUELS COVERED: Gasoline, diesel fuel, propane, butane, kerosene, coal coke, petroleum coke, coal, distillation gas, ethanol, biodiesel, biomethane, natural gas, and heating oil.
INCLUSION THRESHOLDS: Emissions equal to or greater than 25,000 tCO2e per year. Fuel distributors that distribute more than 200L of fuel are included.
VOLUNTARY EMITTERS (OPT-IN COVERED ENTITIES): Since 2019, emitters from capped sectors that have reported emissions equal to or greater than 10,000 tCO2e per year but less than 25,000 tCO2e per year may voluntarily register with the C&T System as a covered entity. If their production activity is eligible, they may receive free allocation.
Upstream (buildings, transport, agriculture and forestry fuel use); point source (mining and extractives, industry, in-province power); imported electricity at the point of first delivery onto Québec’s electricity grid.
125 covered entities, representing 168 facilities (82 industrial facilities, 42 fuel distributors and 44 opt-in emitters) (2024)
Allowance Allocation & Revenue
Proportion of cap auctioned: 59% (2025)
Emission units are distributed via both auctions and free allocation by the government or can be directed to reserves for future sales.
FIRST TO THIRD COMPLIANCE PERIODS:
Free allocation: EITE sectors received a portion of their emission units for free because they were considered vulnerable to carbon leakage. Eligible sectors included aluminum, lime, cement, chemical and petrochemicals, metallurgy, mining and pelletizing, pulp and paper, petroleum refining, and others such as manufacturers of glass containers, gypsum products, and some agro-food products. Electricity producers with a fixed-price sales contract signed before 2008 that did not allow carbon cost passthrough were also eligible to receive free units. Free allocation was also issued to compensate for the carbon cost already paid on electricity imported from a jurisdiction outside the Québec-California linked market (for example, RGGI).
In most cases, the volume of free allocation was determined by actual levels of production or consumption of raw materials (depending on the reference unit for the sector), a declining intensity target based on historical averages, depending on the type of emissions (e.g., fixed process, combustion, and other, mainly fugitive emissions), and an assistance factor. Until 2020, the assistance factors for all EITE sectors were set at 100%. If the available historical data was not sufficient, an energy-based methodology was used to determine the amount of free allocation issued.
Over the first three compliance periods, ~148 million emission units, representing ~36% of the cap for the period, were allocated for free.
Auctioning: Electricity and fuel distributors (included since 2015) were required to buy 100% of their allowances, with some narrow exceptions (e.g., on electricity contracts prior to 2008 that have not been renewed or extended). Emission units were auctioned quarterly. Units that remained unsold after an auction could be offered for sale again when the price at two consecutive auctions settled above the minimum price.
Over the first three compliance periods, ~256 million emission units, representing ~63% of the cap for the period, were auctioned or directed to reserves.
FOURTH COMPLIANCE PERIOD:
Free allocation: Assistance factors were determined based on trade exposure and emissions intensity. These metrics grouped the industrial sector’s carbon leakage risk into three categories (“low”, “medium”, and “high”), with assistance factors of 90%, 95%, and 100% respectively. An assistance factor of 60% applied to steam production for industrial purposes and off-site electricity producers with the fixed-price sales contracts signed before 2008. For 2021 to 2023, ~59 million emission units, representing ~36% of the cap for the period, were allocated for free.
Auctioning: The same auctioning provisions as in the first three periods were used. For 2021 to 2023, ~96.6 million emission units, representing ~60% of the annual caps, were allocated by auction or directed to reserves.
2024 ONWARD:
Free allocation: New rules adopted in September 2022 introduced a more significant decrease in the level of free allocation from 2024. The rate of reduction is determined by the following factors: i) minimal expected effort of at least one percentage point (pp); ii) the cap decline factor of 2.3 pp; iii) an extra expected effort of 0 to 1.4 pp based on the carbon leakage risk; iv) whether the proportion of fixed process emissions exceeds 50% of total emissions in which case the extra effort expected is reduced by 0.3 pp; and v) a trajectory modulation factor, which reduces the rate of reduction in the initial years and increase it in the later ones, with no net effect over the 2024 to 2030 period.
A portion of the emission units resulting from the reduction in the level of free allocation are consigned for auction on behalf of emitters. The proceeds from the auctioning of the consigned units are set aside on behalf of each business to finance projects related to climate transition. The intensity targets for 2024 to 2030 are determined based on the intensity targets set for 2023 as well as the emission levels observed between 2017 and 2019.
Auctioning: The same auctioning provisions apply from the first four periods. For 2025, ~30.7 million emission units, representing ~61% of the 2025 annual cap, were allocated by auction (including consigned units) or directed to reserves.
CAD 10.97 billion (USD7.85 billion) since beginning of program
CAD 1.11 billion (USD 0.79 billion in 2025)
All auction revenues go to the Electrification and Climate Change Fund. This fund, entirely dedicated to climate action, supports the implementation of mitigation and adaptation measures contained in the 2030 Plan for a Green Economy and includes energy efficiency, electrification, and public transport.
Since the beginning of the program, more than CAD 10.97 billion (USD 7.85 billion) has been raised.
Flexibility & Linking
Banking is allowed, but the emitter is subject to a general holding limit on emission units to which all entities in the system are held. The holding limit decreases in line with the annual emission unit budget.
Borrowing is not allowed. However, some emission units from future vintages are offered at each auction and can be traded but not used for compliance until the compliance date for the respective vintage year.
The use of offset credits is allowed.
QUALITATIVE CRITERIA: Offset credits generated from eligible projects in the province are fungible in the Québec-California linked carbon market. A new regulatory framework based on ministerial regulations, which came into force in July 2021, will gradually replace the previous system of offset protocols. The ministerial regulations allow the following offset project types:
- reclamation and destruction of methane from landfill sites;
- destruction of halocarbons;
- carbon sequestration through afforestation or reforestation on private lands; and
anaerobic digestion of manure.
For a transitionary period, the following project types will remain eligible under three protocols:
- destruction of methane from covered manure storage facilities;
- destruction of methane from drainage systems at active coal mines; and
- destruction of methane from ventilation systems of active underground coal mines.
Other types of projects are under consideration, including fuel substitution in the marine transport sector, improvements in the application practices of agricultural fertilizers, and afforestation or reforestation on public lands.
Québec offset credits are 100% guaranteed. This means that in cases where offset credits issued for a project are later deemed illegitimate by the regulator, the offset promoter (i.e., project owner) is required to replace them. If credit recovery is not possible, an equivalent number of offset credits is retired from the government’s environmental integrity account. This account is funded by the automatic withholding of 3% of offset credits issued from all offset projects.
QUANTITATIVE LIMITS: Offset credits can be used for up to 8% of each entity’s compliance obligation.
Over the first four compliance periods (2013 to 2023), more than 33 million offset credits were surrendered by entities in Québec, representing around 6% of the total compliance obligation. 96% of these surrendered credits were issued in California.
In the fourth compliance period (2020 to 2023), 13.6 million offset credits were surrendered by Québec-based entities, with 72% (9.9 million) from US forest projects, 21% (2.9 million) from mine methane capture projects, 3% (433,353) from livestock manure digester projects, 2% (280,759) from landfill methane destruction projects, and 1% (189,115) from ozone-depleting substances projects.
Québec linked its system with California’s in January 2014. The two extended their joint market by linking with Ontario in January 2018 until the termination of Ontario’s system in mid-2018. In March and September 2024, joint statements from the governments of Québec, California, and Washington have affirmed their commitment to explore potential linkage.
Compliance
Three years
The Québec C&T System is structured around three-year compliance periods, except for the first period (see ‘ETS Size & Phases’ section). A cap trajectory until 2030 has been set (see ‘Cap’ section). Allowances must be surrendered by November following the end of a compliance period
FRAMEWORK: Regulation respecting mandatory reporting of certain emissions of contaminants into the atmosphere is enacted under the “Environment Quality Act (Q‑2)” and set out in Q‑2, r. 15.
MONITORING: Québec’s “Regulation respecting mandatory reporting of certain emissions of contaminants into the atmosphere” (Q‑2, r. 15) sets out calculation and reporting methods but does not require operators to submit a formal monitoring plan to the ministry.
The MRV regulations establish the following thresholds:
• 10,000 tCO2e: Mandatory GHG reporting for any establishment emitting ≥10,000 tCO2e. Third‑party verification applies only where the reporter is an ETS emitter as defined in sections 2 or 2.1 of the cap‑and‑trade regulation (Q‑2, r. 46.1), as referenced in section 6.6 of Q‑2, r. 15 (i.e., industrial ETS installations and opt‑ins as well as fuel distributors or electricity importers).
• ETS coverage is defined in Québec’s cap‑and‑trade regulation, the “Règlement concernant le système de plafonnement et d’échange de droits d’émission de gaz à effet de serre (RSPEDE; CQLR c. Q‑2, r. 46.1)” by categories (e.g., covered facilities, fuel distributors, electricity importers) and associated thresholds, including a distribution threshold of 200 liters or more of fuel (protocol QC.30) for fuel distributors.
MRV obligations in non-ETS sectors:
• All establishments emitting ≥10,000 tCO2e are subject to mandatory GHG reporting; certain activities (electricity imports/exports, natural gas distribution, fuel distribution) are reported at enterprise level as specified in section 6.1 of Q‑2, r. 15.
The MRV regulation came into force in 2007. Verification became mandatory in 2012 for industrial emitters and in 2014 for fuel distributors
REPORTING: Annual. Reporting deadline: June 1 each year for emissions from the preceding calendar year (sections 4, 5 and 6.2 of Q‑2, r. 15).
VERIFICATION: Emitters referred to in section 6.6 of Q‑2, r. 15, i.e., ETS facilities as defined in sections 2 or 2.1 of Québec’s cap‑and‑trade regulation (RSPEDE; Q‑2, r. 46.1), must obtain independent verification of their annual GHG reports by a third‑party organization accredited to ISO 14065, by a member of the International Accreditation Forum and in compliance with an ISO-17011 program; specified emissions types are exempt from verification (section 6.6, second paragraph). The verification report is due no later than June 1 each year for emissions from the preceding calendar year (section 6.6; ministry guidance).
A covered entity that fails to cover its GHG emissions with enough allowances by the compliance deadline must remit each missing allowance plus three additional allowances for each allowance it failed to surrender.
For non-compliance, entities can be imposed an administrative sanction of CAD 10,000 (USD 7153) and can be fined CAD 3,000 to CAD 600,000 (USD 2,145 to USD 429,180) for each tCO2e not covered.
In addition, the Minister of the Environment, the Fight against Climate Change, Wildlife, and Parks may suspend emission unit allocation to any non-compliant emitter.
Market Regulation
MARKET PARTICIPATION: Compliance entities, including those that opt into the system (“emitters”). Non-compliance entities with an establishment in Canada and individuals domiciled in Canada (“participants”) can participate through:
• purchasing, holding, selling, or retiring compliance instruments;
• operating an offset project registered with the Ministry; or
• providing clearing services as qualified entities.
Emitters and participants must have an account in the Compliance Instrument Tracking System Service (CITSS). Additional eligibility criteria apply.
MARKET TYPES:
Primary: The majority of allowances are distributed via auctioning. Four auctions, held jointly with California, take place each year. Participants must have an approved account in CITSS and apply to take part in auctions at least 30 days in advance. Auctions are administered by the Western Climate Initiative, Inc.
Secondary: Exchange trading of allowances (emission units and offsets) issued by both California and Québec takes place on platforms such as the Intercontinental Exchange (ICE), the CME group, and the Nodal Exchange. Allowances are traded as futures and options contracts. Any company qualified to access these platforms can trade directly or through a future commission merchant. Companies can also trade directly over the counter. All transactions must be notified to the ministry, with information such as the quantity and vintage of allowances and the settlement price. The only exception to the notification requirement relates to transactions between related entities and bundled transfers as specified in Section 25 of the Regulation.
LEGAL STATUS OF ALLOWANCES: Under the Environmental Quality Act, emission allowances include emission units, offset credits, early reduction credits and any other emission allowance determined by regulation of the Government, each being equal to 1 tCO2e. They can be used to comply with the pertinent regulation. They do not constitute financial instruments in Québec.
AUCTION RESERVE PRICE
Instrument type: Price-based instrument
Functioning: The auction reserve price is set at CAD 26.47 and USD 27.94 per allowance in 2026.
The auction reserve price in each auction is determined using the minimum prices set and released annually by Québec in CAD and California in USD in accordance with Article 49 of the “Regulation respecting a cap-and-trade system for greenhouse gas emission allowances” (Québec Regulation) and Section 95911 of California’s cap-and-trade regulation. To manage multiple currencies, an Auction Exchange Rate is determined prior to each joint auction. The Auction Reserve Price in each auction is then determined as the higher of the Annual Auction Reserve Prices established in USD and CAD after applying the established Auction Exchange Rate (USD to CAD FX Rate). The auction reserve price increases annually by 5% plus inflation, as measured by the Consumer Price Index.
RESERVE ACCOUNT
Instrument type: Price-based instrument
Functioning: Québec maintains an emission unit reserve to sell to entities that do not have enough allowances to cover their obligations (“sales by mutual agreement”). The reserve is filled with set portions of the annual caps: 1% for 2013 to 2014; 4% for 2015 to 2017; 7% for 2018 to 2020, and 4% for 2021 to 2030.
Sales by mutual agreement are held a maximum of four times per year at three price categories that contain an equal share of emission units. Only covered entities in Québec are eligible to purchase units from the reserve, and only if they do not have enough compliance instruments that can be used to cover emissions for the current period in their general account. To date, no such sales have been held.
For 2026, the prices of the three tiers are CAD 63.12 (USD 45.15), CAD 81.09 (USD 58.00), and CAD 99.10 (USD 70.89). However, if partner entities have set higher prices per unit for a corresponding category, Québec units would be sold at the highest of the prices of both jurisdictions according to the daily average exchange rate of the Bank of Canada published on its website on the day preceding the sale. Unlike California, the highest tier will not act as a price ceiling for Québec. Just like auction reserve prices, reserve prices increase annually by 5% plus inflation.
Other Information
Ministère de l’Environnement, de la Lutte contre les changements climatiques, de la Faune et des Parcs (Ministry of the Environment, the Fight against Climate Change, Wildlife and Parks): Overall responsibility for implementing the Cap-and-Trade System in Québec.
Western Climate Initiative, Inc.: Non-profit organization that provides cost-effective administrative and technical solutions for supporting the coordinated development and implementation of participating jurisdictions’ GHG emissions trading programs, such as administering auctions and maintaining the system registry.
The regulation is adjusted almost annually to implement changes and, where necessary, maintain harmonization with linked jurisdictions.
USA - California Cap-and-Invest Program
General Information
The California Cap-and-Invest Program began operation in 2012 with the opening of its tracking system for allocation, auction distribution, and trading of compliance instruments. Compliance obligations started in January 2013. The program was extended through 2045 and renamed Cap-and-Invest by legislation adopted in 2025. The program puts a carbon price on ~76% of the state’s GHG emissions.
The program covers fuel combustion emissions in the mining, power, buildings, transport, industrial, agriculture, and forestry sectors, as well as industrial process emissions of about 400 covered facilities. Fuel use in buildings, transportation, and in agricultural, forestry, and fishing operations is covered upstream at the fuel supplier. Covered entities must surrender allowances for all their covered emissions. Allowances are distributed via a combination of auction, free allocation, and free allocation with consignment. The proceeds from auctioning are reinvested in projects that reduce emissions, strengthening the economy, public health, and the environment, especially in disadvantaged communities.
The California Cap-and-Invest Program is implemented under the authority of the California Air Resources Board (CARB). California has been part of the Western Climate Initiative (WCI) since 2007 and formally linked its program with Québec’s in January 2014.
In September 2025, California adopted Assembly Bill 1207 (AB 1207) and Senate Bill 840 (SB 840), which extended the Cap-and-Invest Program (formerly Cap-and-Trade) through 2045 and made technical changes to the Program.
AB 1207 directs CARB to ensure that program-wide aggregate emissions from covered sources decline, at a minimum, in line with the state’s 2030 and 2045 climate targets, maintain robust price-containment mechanisms, set offset usage limits for 2031 to 2045, and remove allowances from future budgets equal to offsets used for compliance, while considering cost-effectiveness and affordability, minimizing leakage risks, and avoiding disproportionate impacts on low-income communities. SB 840 complements these changes by requiring CARB to conduct an evaluation of the Compliance Offsets Program by the end of 2026 and to update all existing compliance offset protocols to reflect the best available science by January 1, 2029.
By 2034 and every five years thereafter, SB 840 further requires CARB to evaluate all compliance offset protocols and consider whether updates are necessary to reflect the best available science. SB 840 also sets future appropriation rules for Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund programs, including affordable housing, sustainable communities, community air monitoring, and high-speed rail.
In January 2026, CARB proposed changes to the Cap-and-Invest Regulation to implement the requirements of AB 1207. The formal rulemaking process is underway with regulatory amendments expected to be adopted and reflected in allowance budgets from 2027 onwards.
California and Québec continue to operate a joint carbon market, while California, Québec, and Washington continue discussions about potential future linkage of Washington’s program to the joint market.
Emissions & Targets
360.4 MtCO2e (2023)
By 2030: 40% reduction from 1990 GHG levels (“SB 32”)
By 2045: Carbon neutrality and 85% reduction from 1990 anthropogenic GHG levels (“AB 1279”)
Updated prices available here
- Average Current Auction price: USD 28.14* (2025)
- Average secondary market price: USD 29.10 (2025)
* “Current auction settlement price“ in USD, weighted by the total number of government-owned and consignment current vintage allowances sold in the year for both California and Québec.
Size & Phases
FIRST COMPLIANCE PERIOD: Two years (2013 to 2014)
SECOND COMPLIANCE PERIOD: Three years (2015 to 2017)
THIRD COMPLIANCE PERIOD: Three years (2018 to 2020)
FOURTH COMPLIANCE PERIOD: Three years (2021 to 2023)
FIFTH COMPLIANCE PERIOD: Three years (2024 to 2026)
SIXTH COMPLIANCE PERIOD: Three years (2027 to 2029)
An absolute cap limits the total emissions allowed in the system and is fixed ex-ante.
FIRST COMPLIANCE PERIOD: The system started in 2013 with a cap of 162.8 MtCO2e, declining to 159.7 MtCO2e in 2014, at a rate of ~2% annually.
SECOND COMPLIANCE PERIOD: With the program expanding to include fuel distribution, the cap rose to 394.5 MtCO2e in 2015. The cap decline factor averaged 3.1% per year in the second compliance period, reaching 370.4 MtCO2e.
THIRD COMPLIANCE PERIOD: The cap in the third compliance period started at 358.3 MtCO2e and declined at an average annual rate of 3.3% to 334.2 MtCO2e in 2020.
FOURTH COMPLIANCE PERIOD AND BEYOND: During the 2021 to 2030 period, the cap declines by about 13.4 MtCO2e each year, averaging ~4%, to reach 200.5 MtCO2e in 2030. The “Cap-and-Invest Regulation” (the Regulation) sets a formula for declining caps after 2030 through 2050.
Rulemaking is underway to implement recent legislative requirements and to align allowance budgets with California’s 2030 and 2045 targets.
FIRST COMPLIANCE PERIOD: Covered sectors included those that have one or more of the following processes or operations: large industrial facilities (including cement, glass, hydrogen, iron and steel, lead, lime manufacturing, nitric acid, petroleum and natural gas systems, petroleum refining, and pulp and paper manufacturing, including cogeneration facilities co-owned/operated at any of these facilities); electricity generation; electricity imports; other stationary combustion; and CO2 suppliers.
SECOND COMPLIANCE PERIOD AND BEYOND: In addition to the sectors listed above, suppliers of natural gas, suppliers of reformulatedblendstock for oxygenateblending (i.e., gasoline blendstock) and distillate fuel oil (i.e., diesel fuel), suppliers of liquefied petroleum gas in California, and suppliers of liquefied natural gas are covered by the program.
INCLUSION THRESHOLDS: Facilities emitting greater than or equal to 25,000 tCO2e per year. All electricity imported from specified sources connected to a specific generator with emissions greater than or equal to 25,000 tCO2e per year is covered. Emissions associated with imported electricity from unspecified sources have a zero threshold, and all imported electricity emissions are covered using a default emissions factor.
OPT-IN COVERED ENTITIES: A facility in one of the covered sectors that emits less than 25,000 tCO2e annually can voluntarily participate in the Program. Opt-in entities are subject to all registration, reporting, verification, compliance obligations, and enforcement applicable to covered entities.
Upstream (buildings, transport, agriculture, and forestry fuel use); point source (mining and extractives, industry, in-state power generation); imported electricity at the point of first delivery onto California’s electricity grid
~400 facilities (2025)
Allowance Allocation & Revenue
Proportion of 2025 cap auctioned as 2025 vintage units: 42.8%*
Allowances are distributed via free allocation, free allocation with consignment, and auction.
FREE ALLOCATION: Industrial facilities receive free allowances to minimize carbon leakage. For nearly all industrial facilities, the amount is determined by product-specific benchmarks, recent production volumes, a cap adjustment factor, and an assistance factor based on assessment of leakage risk. **
Leakage risk is divided into “low”, “medium”, and “high” risk tiers based on levels of emissions intensity and trade exposure for each specific industrial sector.
FIRST COMPLIANCE PERIOD: The Regulation as adopted in 2011 set assistance factors of 100% for the first compliance period, regardless of leakage risk.
SECOND COMPLIANCE PERIOD AND BEYOND: For facilities with medium leakage risk, the original regulation included an assistance factor decline to 75% for the second compliance period and to 50% for the third. For facilities with low leakage risk, it included an assistance factor decline to 50% for the second compliance period and to 30% for the third. However, amendments to the Regulation in 2013 delayed these assistance factor declines by one compliance period. Pursuant to “AB 398” adopted in 2017, all assistance factors were changed to 100% through 2030, citing continued vulnerability to carbon leakage. There is no cap on the total amount of industrial allocation, but the formula for allocation includes a declining cap adjustment factor to gradually reduce allocation in line with the overall cap trajectory.
Free allocation is also provided for transition assistance to public wholesale water entities, legacy contract generators, universities, public service facilities, and, during the period from 2018 to 2024, waste-to-energy facilities.
FREE ALLOCATION WITH CONSIGNMENT: Electrical distribution utilities and natural gas suppliers receive free allocation on behalf of their ratepayers.*** These utilities must use the allowance value for ratepayer benefit and for GHG emissions reductions. All allowances allocated to investor-owned electric utilities and an annually increasing percentage of the allocation to natural gas suppliers must be consigned for sale at the state’s regular quarterly auctions. Publicly owned electric utilities can choose to consign freely allocated allowances to auction or use them for their own compliance needs.
AUCTIONING:
- Auction share: ~67% of total California-issued vintage 2025 allowances made available through auction in 2025, which included allowances owned by CARB (~35%) and allowances consigned to auction by utilities (~32%).
- Auction volume: 174,505,948 (2025 vintage); 22,730,000 (2028 vintage).
- Share of the 2025 cap auctioned as vintage 2025 CARB-owned allowances so far: 42.8%.
Unsold allowances in past auctions are gradually released for sale at auction after two consecutive auctions are held in which the clearing price is higher than the minimum price. However, if any of these allowances remain unsold after 24 months, they will be placed into CARB’s price ceiling reserve or into the two lower reserve tiers (see ‘Market Stability Provisions’ section). To date, 37 million allowances originally designated for auction have been placed in reserves through these provisions.
* Excluding consigned allowances.
** See Section 95891(c) of the Regulation for a minor exception.
*** See Section 95892 and Section 95893 of the Regulation for further details on the approach to free allocations for electrical distribution utilities and natural gas suppliers, respectively.
USD 34.5 billion since beginning of program
USD 3.13 billion* in 2025
* Does not include revenues from the auction of consigned allowances.
Revenue from auction of California-owned allowances: Most of California’s auction revenue goes to the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, of which at least 35% must benefit disadvantaged and low-income communities. The funds are then distributed as California Climate Investments, which support projects that deliver significant environmental, economic, and public health benefits across the state. As of November 2024, USD 12.8 billion had been invested in 590,703 projects, with expected GHG reductions of 116.1 MtCO2e.
Over USD 9.2 billion has reached disadvantaged and low-income communities.
Revenue from auction of utility-owned allowances: Investor-owned electric utilities and natural gas suppliers are allocated allowances, a portion of which must be consigned to auction. Auction proceeds must be used for ratepayer benefit and for GHG emissions reductions. Since the Program’s inception, approximately USD 26.5 billion in allowance value has been provided to ratepayers. Investor-owned electric utilities and natural gas suppliers have provided USD 13.5 billion directly to residential ratepayers through 2024 via the California Climate Credit.
Flexibility & Linking
Banking is allowed but is subject to a holding limit on allowances to which all entities in the system are held. The holding limit is based on the year’s cap and decreases annually. Entities may also be eligible for a limited exemption from the holding limit based on their emissions levels to support meeting annual compliance obligations or obligations at the end of a three-year compliance period.
Borrowing is not allowed.
The use of compliance offset credits is allowed. Such credits, issued by CARB or by the authority of a linked system, are compliance instruments under the California Cap-and-Invest Program.
QUALITATIVE LIMIT: Currently, offset credits originating from projects carried out according to one of the following six compliance offset protocols are accepted as compliance instruments:
- US forest projects;
- urban forest projects;
- livestock projects (methane management);
- ozone-depleting substances projects;
- mine methane capture projects; and
- rice cultivation projects.
Compliance offset credits issued by jurisdictions linked with California (i.e., Québec) are eligible, subject to the quantitative limits described below.
To ensure environmental integrity, California’s compliance offset program has incorporated the principle of buyer liability. The state may invalidate an offset credit that is later determined not to have met the requirements of its compliance offset protocol due to double counting, over-issuance, or regulatory non-conformance. The entity that surrendered the offset credit for compliance must then substitute a valid compliance instrument for the invalidated offset credit.
QUANTITATIVE LIMIT: The share of offsets that can be used by an entity to fulfill its compliance obligation is 4% per year for 2021 to 2025 emissions, and 6% for 2026 to 2045 emissions.
In addition to setting new quantitative limits on the use of offset credits, AB 398 set new limits on the types of offset credits that can be used to fulfill compliance obligations. Starting with compliance obligations for 2021 emissions, no more than 50% of any entity’s offset usage limit can come from offset projects that do not provide direct environmental benefits to the state (DEBS).
Projects located within California are automatically considered to provide DEBS. Offset projects implemented outside of California may still result in DEBS, based on scientific evidence and project data provided. For example, a forest project outside California has been determined to provide benefits within California by improving the quality of water flowing through the state. Recent regulatory amendments specify the criteria used to determine DEBS.
In November 2022, California entities surrendered ~2.2 million offset credits for a portion of 2021 emissions. In November 2023, California entities surrendered ~2 million offset credits for a portion of 2022 emissions.
In November 2024, California entities surrendered an additional 22 million credits for the remainder of their emissions during the fourth compliance period, while Québec entities surrendered 13.3 million California-issued offset credits. Of the 35.2 million credits surrendered, 26.5 million were from US forest offset projects and 5.3 million from mine methane capture projects.
In November 2025, California entities surrendered ~2.2 million offset credits at the annual compliance event for the first year of the fifth compliance period (2024), when compliance for 30% of the 2024 annual emissions was required.
California’s program linked with Québec’s in January 2014. The two expanded their joint market by linking with Ontario in January 2018 until the termination of Ontario’s system in mid-2018. In March and September 2024, joint statements from the governments of Québec, California, and Washington affirmed their commitment to explore potential linkage.
Compliance
Except for the year following the last year of a compliance period, compliance instruments equal to 30% of the previous year’s verified emissions must be surrendered annually, by the start of November. Compliance instruments equal to all remaining emissions must be surrendered by the start of November of the year following the last year of a compliance period.
FRAMEWORK: California’s MRV framework is set by the “Regulation for the Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gas Emissions (MRR), title 17 California Code of Regulations (CCR) §§ 95100-95163”. The “Cap‑and‑Invest Regulation, title 17 CCR §§ 95801-96022” relies on MRR data.
MONITORING: Reporters must use calculation, monitoring, QA/QC, missing data, recordkeeping, and reporting methods specified in MRR.
MRR requires that reporters subject to the regulation maintain a GHG Monitoring Plan for facilities and suppliers that includes detailed, source‑specific monitoring and QA/QC obligations and record retention for all data used to calculate emissions, specified in MRR § 95105(c). Similarly, electric power entities that import or export electricity must maintain a GHG inventory program, as specified in MRR § 95105(d).
REPORTING: Annual reporting for the following entities based on emissions thresholds listed, using the standardized methods and formats specified in MRR:
- Facilities in specified categories (e.g., large power plants under 40 CFR Part 75, cement, lime, nitric acid, refineries, CO₂ sequestration/injection) report regardless of emissions level.
- Other facilities (e.g., stationary combustion, glass, hydrogen, iron and steel, pulp and paper, petroleum and natural gas systems, geothermal, lead) report at ≥10,000 tCO₂e/year of stationary and process emissions; petroleum and natural gas systems also apply a 25,000 tCO₂e threshold when including vented and fugitive emissions.
- Fuel and CO₂ suppliers report at ≥10,000 tCO₂e/year, calculated as volume of CO2 supplied, or based on emissions that would result from combustion of the fuels supplied
- Importers or exporters of electricity as defined in § 95102(a) with any volume of imported or exported electricity, retail providers as defined in § 95102(a), along with certain public agencies specified in § 95101(d)
VERIFICATION: Third‑party verification is required under MRR for emissions data reports of entities with a compliance obligation under the Cap‑and‑Invest Regulation and for other reporters above specified thresholds or categories, as specified in § 95103(f).
Verification requirements, including requirements for the accreditation of verification bodies and individual verifiers are specified in §§ 95130-95133. Similar accreditation and conflict‑of‑interest provisions apply to offset verifiers and verification bodies under Cap‑and‑Invest Regulation §§ 95977–95978.
Entities remain subject to annual reporting (and, where applicable, verification) under MRR until they meet the cessation conditions in § 95101(h)-(i).
A covered entity that fails to surrender sufficient compliance instruments to cover its verified GHG emissions at a relevant compliance deadline is automatically assessed an untimely surrender obligation. It is required to surrender the missing compliance instruments as well as three additional ones for each it failed to surrender.
Failure to meet this untimely surrender obligation would subject the entity to substantial financial penalties for its noncompliance, pursuant to “California Health and Safety Code Section 38580”.
Separate and substantial penalties apply to mis-reporting or non-reporting under the MRR.
Market Regulation
MARKET PARTICIPATION: Covered entities, opt-in covered entities, and voluntarily associated entities can participate in the program. Voluntarily associated entities are approved individuals or entities that intend to:
- purchase, hold, sell, or retire compliance instruments but are not covered under the program;
- operate a compliance offset project registered with CARB; or
- provide clearing services and derivative clearing services as qualified entities.
Voluntarily associated entities must be in the United States and have an approved account in the system registry, the Compliance Instrument Tracking System Service (CITSS). Additional eligibility criteria apply, including for individual market participants.
MARKET TYPES:
Primary: Allowances are made available through sealed-bid auctions. State-owned and consigned allowances are offered through quarterly allowance auctions organized jointly with Québec. Auctions are administered by WCI, Inc.
Secondary: Allowances, offset credits, and financial derivatives are traded in the secondary market on the Intercontinental Exchange (ICE), CME Group, and Nodal Exchange platforms. Any company qualified to access these platforms can trade directly or through a future commission merchant. Companies can also trade directly over the counter but must have a CITSS account to take delivery of compliance instruments.
LEGAL STATUS OF ALLOWANCES: Allowances are defined as limited tradable authorizations to emit up to one tCO2e. According to the “California Code of Regulations”, an allowance does not constitute property or bestow property rights and cannot limit the authority of the regulator to terminate or limit such authorization to emit.
AUCTION RESERVE PRICE
Instrument type: Price-based instrument
Functioning: The auction reserve price is set at USD 27.94 and CAD 26.47 per allowance in 2026.
It was initially established at USD 10.00 for the auction in 2012, and it increases annually by 5% plus inflation, as measured by the Consumer Price Index. The auction reserve price for each joint auction with Québec is determined using the minimum prices set annually by California in USD in accordance with Section 95911 of the Regulation and by Québec in CAD in accordance with Article 49 of the “Regulation respecting a cap-and-trade system for greenhouse gas emission allowances” (Québec Regulation). To manage multiple currencies, an Auction Exchange Rate is determined prior to each joint auction. The Auction Reserve Price for a joint auction is then determined as the higher of the Annual Auction Reserve Prices established in USD and CAD after applying the established Auction Exchange Rate (USD to CAD FX Rate).
ALLOWANCE PRICE CONTAINMENT RESERVE (APCR)
Instrument type: Price-based instrument
Functioning: In 2026, the two APCR tiers are set at USD 65.31 and USD 83.92 per allowance. Tier prices increase each year by 5% plus inflation, as measured by the Consumer Price Index.
At the start of the program, about 4.9% of allowances from the 2013 to 2020 budgets were placed in an APCR. Prior to amendments mandated by AB 398 in 2017, these allowances were spread across three tiers. Pursuant to AB 398, from 2021 onward, these allowances have been moved into two price tiers and a price ceiling. Currently, there are approximately 66.8 million and 89.5 million allowances in the Tier 1 and 2 reserves, respectively.
Although no APCR sale has been held so far, CARB will offer one if auction settlement prices from the preceding quarter are greater than or equal to 60% of the lowest APCR price tier. CARB also always offers the third quarter APCR sale before the November compliance obligation deadline.
ALLOWANCE PRICE CEILING
Instrument type: Price-based instrument
Functioning: In 2026, the price ceiling is set at USD 102.52. The price ceiling increases each year by 5% plus inflation, as measured by the Consumer Price Index.
At the price ceiling, a covered entity can purchase allowances (or, if no allowances remain, “price ceiling units”) up to the amount of its current unfulfilled emissions obligation. The revenues from the sale of price ceiling units will be used to purchase real, permanent, quantifiable, verifiable, enforceable, and additional emissions reductions on at least a tonne for tonne basis. Sales at the price ceiling will only be conducted if no allowances remain at the two lower APCR tiers and a covered entity has demonstrated that it does not have sufficient compliance instruments in its accounts for that year’s compliance event. Currently, there are approximately 77.7 million allowances in the Price Ceiling Account.
Other Information
California Air Resources Board: Responsible for the design and implementation of the Cap-and-Invest Program.
Western Climate Initiative, Inc.: Non-profit organization that provides cost-effective administrative and technical solutions for supporting the coordinated development and implementation of participating jurisdictions’ GHG emissions trading programs, such as administering auctions and maintaining the system registry (CITSS).
Pursuant to requirements in existing legislation (AB 32, AB 197, and AB 398), CARB must update the “California Climate Change Scoping Plan” at least every five years and must provide annual reports to various committees of the Legislature and the Board. The Scoping Plan provides updates on progress toward climate targets and lays out strategies to achieve them, including the role and level of effort accorded to different programs in the state’s portfolio approach to climate mitigation. The latest update to the Scoping Plan was adopted in December 2022.
Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (AB 32)
Current Cap-and-Invest regulation can be found on the dedicated CARB website.
Current MRV regulation can be found on the dedicated CARB website.